\
Mr. Rakesh Tripathi,
Director,
Octal Limited,
The arrival of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) is transforming numerous sectors, with cybersecurity standing out as one of the most critically impacted. The technology brings forth both unprecedented opportunities and formidable challenges. How Gen AI is redefining the cybersecurity landscape, how it’s enhancing defence capabilities while also creating new threats, and key considerations for CISOs and senior management to address these emerging challenges effectively—let’s find out.
Historically, cybersecurity threats have been generally fixed or semi-static and oriented around a core set of tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs). But now the advent of Generative AI has ushered in a new era – one that brings with it more complex and flexible threats. While traditional AI is mainly centred on recognizing patterns and detecting outliers, Gen AI can self-generate content, replicate human behaviours, and even create new types of malware.
Generative AI’s dual nature is both a blessing and curse in the realm of cybersecurity where it not only creates risks but also powers up defence mechanisms.
There are numerous predictions on the tendency of cybersecurity with the emergence of the concept of Gen-AI. The overall development of AI behind the generation of text, images and codes has accelerated and brought with them new challenges and opportunities to cybersecurity defenders. Here’s how:
1. Improved Threat Detection and Response
AI-Driven Security Solutions: Gen AI models can detect patterns within massive volumes of data that may be indicative of a cyber threat. This helps in identifying an attack in the initial stage and ward off the attack resulting in less damage.
Automation and Predictive Analytics: The use of AI in cybersecurity can help identify threats that are likely to emerge in an organisation and deal with them proactively before they occur.
2. New Attack Vectors
AI-Powered Cyber Attacks: Gen AI is applied by cybercriminals to create improved phishing, malware, and social engineering experiences. AI can easily create more or less realistic fake messages, which increases the difficulties of differentiating between real and fake messages between individuals and systems.
Automated Hacking Tools: The technologies of AI are being applied to create tools capable of detecting weaknesses and exploiting them, which may increase the speed of cyber attacks.
3. Challenges relating to Authentication and Identity Management
Deepfakes and Voice Cloning: Gen AI allows deepfakes and cloned voices that may question the effectiveness of biometrics such as fingerprinting and voice recognition. This increases the importance of identity and access management implementations.
Spoofing and Impersonation: Since Gen AI can impersonate persons or generate fake personas, attackers can just forge past security measures.
4. Data Privacy and Protection
AI-Generated Content and Data Privacy: What substantially enhances the process is the use of AI for the generation of synthetic data; however, it entails novel difficulties concerning data protection. Care must be taken to avoid the fact that such created content does reveal information which ideally should not be disclosed.
Regulatory Compliance: As for Gen AI, new cybersecurity AI regulation is required to regulate the application of AI to promote proper use and protect data privacy.
5. Adversarial AI
AI vs. AI: While the defenders are applying AI to protect the systems, the attackers also employ the use of AI to identify the gaps in the implemented AI-security defence. This leads to the formation of a new cycle of attack and defence whereby AI algorithms are used to counter other AI algorithms.
Adversarial Attacks: There are specific methods such as adversarial machine learning, where the attackers can manipulate the AI models so that they can make the wrong decision on certain issues, like for instance, identifying a fraudulent activity as legitimate.
6. Ethical and Bias Consideration in AI-Based Cyber Security
Bias in AI Models: AI is dependent on data fed into the systems and hence its quality depends on the data used in the training of these systems. Hence, when the training data selected is skewed, one may find that their AI-deployed security tools are not as effective in some scenarios as they could be – translating to vulnerabilities.
Ethical Considerations: Various ethical concerns are associated with the application of AI in the cybersecurity field; this includes questions of surveillance as well as privacies and Civil liberties.
7. Skills Deficiency and Changing Dynamics of Workplace
Need for AI Expertise: This is because the implementation of AI in the cybersecurity industry generates a need for a workforce that has equal knowledge in both AI and Cyberspace security. This thus demands developing new programs that will enable the current workforce to be trained, as well as the development of new courses to be taught.
Changing Roles: More specifically, as AI continually takes on mundane work, these cybersecurity specialists may transition from simple tasks to more complex ones such as AI governance, AI policy, AI governance, and future threat identification.
8. Global Cybersecurity Landscape
Nation-State Actors and AI: Governments are also deploying AI applications in their cyber strategies for both countermeasures and cyber attacks. Consequently, these have impacts on the overall state security and international cyberspace power relations.
Collaboration and Information Sharing: The sophistication of artificial intelligence in craft and launching cyber threats requires governments, private sectors and international organisations to intensify information sharing and come up with a common front.
With the emergence of Generative AI, the responsibilities of CISOs are changing more profoundly and rapidly than at any point in time in the past. Security professionals are confronted with challenges and opportunities of this emerging age known as Gen AI as organisations adapt themselves to this period of change. Key considerations for CISOs and senior managers include: Key considerations for CISOs and senior managers include:
Strategic Alignment: Cybersecurity should be aligned with the business strategy and has to incorporate AI for improved security and client’s growth.
Adapting to AI-Driven Threats: CISOs require proactive threat management which involves using artificial intelligence in threat intelligence, automated detection and adversarial artificial intelligence readiness.
Ethical AI Usage: Understanding definitions of fairness and prevention or mitigation of biases and privacy violations in the AI systems with accountability and explainability of AI decision-making.
Workforce Transformation: Training those working in the cybersecurity domain for AI, encouraging interdisciplinary work, and adopting the human-AI Work Partnership model.
Continuous Monitoring: Implementing flexible security measures, perpetual model assessment, and the use of big data.
Regulatory Compliance: Updating oneself with the new regulations on AI and cybersecurity, the data protection laws as well as the legal issues at play.
Investment in Emerging Technologies: Looking into a new generation of AI-based security solutions, thinking of AI SOC and collaboration with the AI tech companies.
Culture of Security and Innovation: Creating awareness, providing the means to foster creativity and thus establish a security-aware culture, and demonstrating the significance of security in the new age of AI within the company’s IT environment.
Cognitive cybersecurity is evolving into a generative force, offering enhanced protection and new avenues for both defence and exploitation by cybercriminals. This dual nature of generative AI demands a more proactive and strategic approach, particularly for CISOs and senior management. To stay ahead of sophisticated threats, organizations must align AI-driven security measures with broader business objectives, treating the integration of AI not as an option but as an essential strategic priority. This means consistently leveraging AI security solutions to preemptively counteract evolving threats while recognizing that malicious actors are also advancing their use of AI. In this new era, AI must be embedded at the core of cybersecurity strategies, empowering organisations to stay resilient and defend against increasingly sophisticated cyberattacks.
Rakesh Tripathi is an independent consultant in Cyber Security, Risk Management, and IT Governance, with over two decades of experience across various industries. His expertise spans Identity and Access Management (IAM), Cyber Security, and Project/Programme Management, with a strong emphasis on designing and implementing security architectures and compliance frameworks like ISO and NIST.
Rakesh holds a Master's degree in Computer Science, with advanced certifications from Oxford University and Harvard University in Executive Leadership and Risk Management. His extensive industry experience spans investment and retail banking, healthcare, payments, and FMCG, and he has earned professional certifications including CCISO, CISSP, and CISA.
Currently providing consultancies as the interim Head of Identity and Access Management for a leading banking client, Rakesh has a proven track record in delivering complex enterprise-wide projects and strategies. He has led global engagements, working closely with senior management and board members to enhance security and risk management frameworks, with expertise extending to financial regulations and compliance to ensure robust protection against emerging threats.